|
For the
past year, members of Owen County’s Growth Management Committee
have worked to find ways the county can continue to grow effectively.
Last Thursday night, the group concluded a series of community
meetings held to present recommendations and to garner feedback
from the community.
The group began its work more than a year ago when members were
appointed by the fiscal court to study the growth of Owen County
in the past, present and future. A similar committee was identified
through the Owen 20/20 process, but organizers of that project
decided not to duplicate efforts.
The committee consists of 12 members, chosen to represent a number
of different community groups. Members are Carolyn Keith, Carol
Ann Prather, Johnny Jump, Bernie Engelman, David Chappell, Mark
Cleveland, Gilbert England, Jennifer Duncan Smith, Todd Marston,
Debbie Croley, Todd Spurgeon and Ed Ashcraft.
In addition to the one or two times he said they met each month
during the process, Ashcraft said the committee held five community
meetings over the past three months in different parts of the
county. These meetings allowed them to discuss their findings
as well as get comments and suggestions from the public. Through
these meetings and their survey of the county, the committee has
come up with a list of recommendations.
“We will now take that and meet to discuss what we learned
before we make our final recommendations,” Ashcraft said.
In the last community meeting on Thursday, six recommendations
were read. Ashcraft said they are preliminary recommendations
and could all change based on the feedback the committee received.
“We got really helpful input at every meeting,” he
said.
The committee is not responsible for implementing these recommendations.
Its job is to see what needs to be done to effectively manage
the growth in Owen County. The six recommendations that were discussed
at last week’s meeting ranged from a “Right to Farm”
ordinance to a nuisance ordinance. The fiscal court is ultimately
responsible for the steps that need to be taken concerning the
way in which this county is continuing to grow.
Ashcraft said the committee does not take any money from the county
for mileage or expenses.
“We felt better like that,” he said. “We weren’t
spending the county’s money.”
Spurgeon stressed that the committee is independent with no political
agenda. He calls the committee an advisory one and said there
is no leader at the committee’s meetings.
“We wanted to go through this with an open mind,”
Spurgeon said.
The committee looked at the growth management plan of other counties,
including those in Grant, Carroll and Trimble counties. They also
attended a planning and zoning meeting in Henry County. Spurgeon
said they did so to find out why these counties decided to make
those changes.
The committee toured Owen County for three to four hours at a
time to see the regulations and ordinances the community has in
place today.
“We have to decide whether to be proactive or reactive,”
Spurgeon said. “Maybe we’re doing OK.”
Though he said the committee received good feedback, he said there
were not many people at some of the community meetings held in
the past few months.
Being on the committee allowed Spurgeon to see parts of the county
he hadn’t before. He said he doesn’t get off of some
roads and has seen some blight areas with issues that could be
easily addressed. As far as the feedback from the public he said
that the recommendations need more specifics.
“It seems like that’s what people are looking for,”
Spurgeon said.
For example, many in the community had questions about how the
county would be affected. In one recommendation, a situation was
said to “negatively affect the services of our health care
facilities, law enforcement and school system, as well as quality
of life.” The question was posed as to how those things
would be negatively affected.
The members of the committee took all questions and encouraged
those who didn’t speak up to communicate with them after
the meeting was over.
“We want to hear from you,” Ashcraft said. “You’re
welcome to disagree, so please communicate.”
The recommendations made at last week’s meeting were:
•More aggressive enforcement of the current nuisance ordinance.
The committee recommends the fiscal court designate a specific
person in the county who deals with reporting violations of the
ordinance. The reports will go to the county attorney for prosecution.
They also look to strengthen the ordinance.
•A “Right to Farm” ordinance that guarantees
a farmer’s rights when new residents are not accustomed
to those things that go along with farming, including unpleasant
smells, etc. Trimble County has a similar ordinance.
•Development of regulations to prevent use of land that
would negatively affect Owen County. This includes developments
that would overtax the available utilities, would not have adequate
road access, would not be suitable for construction of sewage
disposal or does not have public sewage disposal available.
•County and city inspection and licensing of non-owner operated
dwellings. This recommendation is meant to protect the health,
safety and welfare of the occupants of those dwellings.
•Development of a vision for the future of Owen County regarding
growth. The recommendation encourages the fiscal court to have
a goal for development of roads, utilities and necessary services.
• No planning and zoning ordinance should be made because
of its complexity and cost. The recommendation does discuss land-use
planning tools.
These recommendations are not final. Final recommendations will
be drafted and presented after the first of the year.
Click Here to Go
Back to Front |